The specified data string represents a combination of personal identifiers. It contains a name (“Paul Greene”), an academic credential (“PhD”), and a contact detail (“phone number 9176936186”). This composite structure allows for the identification and potential communication with an individual.
Such a combination of identifiers can be valuable for verifying credentials, facilitating professional communication, or confirming contact information. Historically, the dissemination of such information has been crucial for establishing networks, validating expertise, and enabling direct outreach. However, the public display of personal information raises concerns regarding privacy and potential misuse.
Subsequent sections will explore the implications of publicly available data, the ethical considerations surrounding personal information, and the methods employed to manage and protect such data in a digital environment. Further discussion will delve into data accuracy, verification processes, and the potential for outdated or inaccurate information.
1. Individual Identification
The process of individual identification is fundamental to the meaning and utility of the specified data. Without the name “Paul Greene,” the “PhD” credential and the phone number “9176936186” would be essentially unlinked to a specific person. The name serves as the primary key, connecting the additional data points to a unique entity. In essence, it allows for the attribution of knowledge and means of communication to a specific person, enabling verification, contact, and information retrieval.
The impact of accurate individual identification is significant. For example, in academic research, associating a PhD credential with the correct individual is crucial for validating expertise and authorship. In a professional context, linking the phone number to the correct “Paul Greene” enables targeted communication for collaboration or recruitment. Conversely, inaccurate or incomplete identification can lead to misattribution of expertise, misdirected communication, and even identity-related complications. Furthermore, the possibility of multiple individuals sharing the same name necessitates careful verification to ensure accurate identification.
In conclusion, individual identification is a prerequisite for the value and functionality of the data string. Its accuracy is vital for the responsible use of the phone number and academic credential. Challenges relating to name ambiguity highlight the importance of robust verification procedures. By accurately linking data to a specific individual, we can ensure the integrity of communication, validation of expertise, and responsible information management.
2. Academic Qualification
The inclusion of “PhD” within the string “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” signifies a conferred doctoral degree, representing a level of expertise and specialized knowledge. This credential serves to distinguish the individual from others with the same name, as well as to imply certain professional capabilities. The academic qualification is, therefore, a crucial component influencing how the individual might be perceived or approached. For example, a prospective client might be more inclined to seek consultation from an individual identified as “Paul Greene PhD” due to the implied expertise associated with the doctoral degree. Conversely, without the “PhD” designation, the assumption of advanced knowledge is not directly made, potentially affecting the nature of interactions and professional opportunities.
The verifiable nature of this academic qualification is essential. Institutions maintain records of conferred degrees, allowing for independent confirmation of the information. This verification process is crucial for ensuring the credibility of the “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” identifier as a whole. Consider the scenario where the stated “PhD” cannot be substantiated; this would undermine the individual’s professional standing and cast doubt on the validity of the provided phone number as a reliable means of contact. The presence of a legitimate academic qualification, therefore, lends credibility to the overall information string.
In conclusion, the “PhD” component of “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” significantly impacts the perception and potential utility of the information. The accuracy of the academic qualification is paramount for maintaining credibility and trust. While the name and phone number offer means of identification and contact, the “PhD” provides a crucial context that influences professional interactions and opportunities. The absence of verifiable qualifications would challenge the integrity of the composite data.
3. Contact Method
Within the data string “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186”, the numerical sequence represents a contact method, specifically a telephone number. This element facilitates direct communication with the identified individual and represents a critical component for enabling interactions. The availability and accuracy of this contact method are essential for achieving the intended purpose of sharing the data, whether for professional networking, academic collaboration, or other forms of outreach.
-
Direct Communication Facilitation
The phone number serves as a direct conduit for initiating conversations. This offers an immediate means to exchange information, schedule meetings, or address specific inquiries. For instance, a potential employer might utilize the provided number to discuss a job opportunity with Paul Greene PhD, while a research colleague might use it to collaborate on a project. The efficiency of direct phone communication contrasts with slower methods like email, underscoring its importance.
-
Verification of Identity
A working phone number can act as a secondary verification tool. Calling the number allows the caller to confirm they are reaching the intended person, mitigating the risk of misidentification or impersonation. In the context of “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186”, this offers a higher level of assurance that the individual reached is indeed the Paul Greene holding the stated PhD, as opposed to someone with a similar name but without the same qualifications.
-
Contextual Relevance and Utility
The utility of the provided phone number is inherently tied to the context in which it is shared. A phone number displayed on a professional website carries different implications than one listed in a publicly accessible database. In the case of “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186”, the value lies in its ability to connect potential collaborators, employers, or clients with an individual holding a doctoral degree. The purpose of sharing the data determines the appropriateness and effectiveness of the contact method.
In conclusion, the telephone number constitutes a vital contact method embedded within “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186”. It provides a means for direct communication, offers an avenue for identity verification, and possesses utility dependent on the context of its dissemination. The accuracy and continued validity of this contact method are crucial for ensuring that the information serves its intended purpose and remains a viable means of reaching the individual.
4. Data Privacy
The data string “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” exemplifies a potential conflict between accessibility and data privacy. The combination of a name, professional credential, and contact number creates a readily identifiable profile. While such data may be intentionally shared for professional purposes, its uncontrolled dissemination can raise significant privacy concerns. The inclusion of a phone number, in particular, makes direct contact possible, which may lead to unwanted solicitations, identity theft attempts, or other forms of privacy violation. The cause-and-effect relationship is clear: the more widely distributed the data, the greater the risk of misuse. The importance of data privacy as a component of this string lies in the potential for harm resulting from its exposure. For instance, if this information is indexed by search engines and easily accessible to the public, it increases the risk of unsolicited contact from marketing firms or even more malevolent actors.
Consider the example of a professional directory where “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” is listed without appropriate privacy controls. While the intent may be to facilitate professional networking, the lack of safeguards could expose the individual to a range of privacy risks. Individuals could use the information to assemble a more complete profile, potentially uncovering sensitive details about Paul Greene. Another practical application relates to data security. If the database where this information is stored is compromised, “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” becomes part of a data breach, increasing the risk of targeted phishing attempts. Thus, understanding the interplay between this data string and privacy principles is crucial for implementing adequate security measures.
In summary, “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” highlights the tension between data accessibility and data privacy. The combination of personally identifiable information necessitates careful consideration of the potential risks associated with its dissemination. Challenges related to controlling the spread of this information, especially online, underscore the need for robust privacy policies and security protocols. The ability to manage and protect such data is essential for maintaining individual privacy and mitigating potential harm.
5. Information Accuracy
Information accuracy is paramount when evaluating the validity and utility of the composite data string “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186”. The reliability of each componentthe name, the academic credential, and the contact numberdirectly affects the overall value and potential impact of the information. Inaccuracies within any element can lead to miscommunication, misidentification, and ultimately undermine the intended purpose of the data.
-
Credential Verification
The “PhD” designation signifies a specific level of academic achievement. If this claim is inaccurate, the entire professional profile is compromised. Verification mechanisms, such as university degree databases, are necessary to confirm the authenticity of the credential. An unsubstantiated claim diminishes the individual’s credibility and potentially misrepresents their expertise, which could mislead prospective employers or collaborators.
-
Contact Number Validity
An incorrect or outdated phone number renders the communication channel ineffective. The number must be active and associated with the correct individual to facilitate meaningful contact. Regular checks and updates are essential to ensure the number remains current. A disconnected or misattributed phone number frustrates communication attempts and can negatively impact professional opportunities.
-
Identity Confirmation
While the name “Paul Greene” provides initial identification, further confirmation may be required, especially given the potential for multiple individuals sharing the same name. Additional identifying information, or a means to verify the connection between the name, credential, and phone number, may be necessary to avoid confusion or misidentification. Erroneous attribution can result in contacting the wrong person or misrepresenting qualifications.
-
Data Source Reliability
The source of the “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” data string significantly impacts its reliability. Information obtained from official university directories or professional websites carries more weight than data sourced from unverified online databases. The credibility of the source directly affects the perceived trustworthiness of the information. Consequently, it is important to evaluate the provenance and maintain a critical perspective when assessing the accuracy of the data.
The accurate representation of each component within “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” is essential for its intended purpose. Each facet – credential, phone number, identity and data source – reinforces data validity. Failure to ensure the accuracy of these details diminishes the value of the information and introduces the potential for adverse consequences. Maintaining rigorous verification processes and evaluating data sources are crucial to upholding the integrity of the provided data.
6. Accessibility Concerns
The ready availability of “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” raises pertinent accessibility concerns, focusing on the implications of its ease of retrieval and potential misuse. Unfettered access to such information can erode individual privacy and expose the data owner to a range of risks, from unwanted solicitations to more severe forms of harassment or identity-related crimes. The considerations around accessibility hinge on who can access the information, how readily it is available, and what controls, if any, are in place to protect it.
-
Unsolicited Contact
Increased accessibility of the phone number leads to a higher likelihood of unsolicited contact. This can range from telemarketing calls to unwanted advances or even harassment. Individuals obtaining the phone number through public directories or online searches can bypass gatekeeping mechanisms and initiate direct contact without prior consent. The consequences can extend beyond mere annoyance to significant disruptions in personal and professional life.
-
Identity Theft Vulnerability
The combination of a name, academic credential, and phone number facilitates identity theft. While the data string itself might not be sufficient to perpetrate extensive fraud, it provides a starting point for malicious actors to gather further information. A publicly accessible phone number can be used to verify stolen credentials or to impersonate the individual for financial gain or other illicit activities. Restricting access to such information mitigates this risk.
-
Data Aggregation and Profiling
The accessibility of “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” allows for easy data aggregation and profiling. Malicious actors can combine this information with other publicly available data to build a comprehensive profile of the individual. This aggregated information can then be used for targeted phishing attacks, social engineering scams, or even physical stalking. Limiting access to the initial data point reduces the ability to build comprehensive profiles.
-
Loss of Control Over Personal Information
Once “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” becomes widely accessible, the individual loses control over its dissemination and use. The data can be copied, shared, and indexed by search engines, making it difficult, if not impossible, to retract. The consequences of this loss of control include a diminished expectation of privacy and an increased vulnerability to unforeseen risks. Careful consideration of the initial disclosure of such information is therefore paramount.
The accessibility of “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” presents a multifaceted challenge. While transparency and professional networking may necessitate sharing certain information, the inherent risks associated with uncontrolled accessibility must be carefully considered. Strategies to balance openness with privacy protection, such as utilizing professional directories with controlled access settings, are essential for mitigating the potential harms associated with readily available personal information.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions and answers address common inquiries and concerns related to the string “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186”.
Question 1: What information does “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” convey?
This string combines a name (“Paul Greene”), an academic credential (“PhD”), and a telephone number (“9176936186”). It provides a means to identify and contact an individual who holds a doctoral degree.
Question 2: What are the potential risks associated with publicly sharing this data?
Public dissemination of this information may lead to unsolicited contact, increased vulnerability to identity theft attempts, and potential privacy violations.
Question 3: How can the accuracy of the information be verified?
The academic credential (“PhD”) can be verified through university records. The validity of the phone number can be confirmed by attempting to contact the individual directly.
Question 4: What measures can be taken to protect the privacy of the individual?
Limiting the distribution of the information, employing privacy settings on online platforms, and being cautious about sharing personal details can mitigate privacy risks.
Question 5: What legal or ethical considerations apply to this type of data?
The legal and ethical considerations involve data protection regulations, privacy laws, and the responsible handling of personal information. Respect for individual privacy is paramount.
Question 6: What alternative contact methods are available that might be more secure?
Alternative contact methods, such as secure messaging platforms or professional email addresses, offer enhanced security and privacy compared to publicly listed phone numbers.
In summary, “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” represents a combination of identifiers that can be valuable for communication and verification. However, its dissemination necessitates careful consideration of potential risks and ethical implications.
The following section will delve into data management strategies to mitigate the challenges and uphold ethical standards related to personal information.
Data Management Tips
This section provides actionable guidelines for managing data similar to “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186,” emphasizing security and ethical considerations.
Tip 1: Prioritize Data Minimization: Collect only the necessary information. Avoid accumulating extraneous data points that increase privacy risks and storage costs. For instance, if a phone number is not essential, refrain from collecting it.
Tip 2: Implement Access Controls: Restrict access to sensitive data based on the principle of least privilege. Ensure that only authorized personnel can view or modify “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186”-style information.
Tip 3: Employ Data Encryption: Encrypt sensitive data both in transit and at rest. Encryption renders the information unintelligible to unauthorized parties, safeguarding it even if a data breach occurs. For example, encrypt the database where phone numbers are stored.
Tip 4: Conduct Regular Data Audits: Periodically review data stores to identify and rectify inaccuracies, redundancies, and outdated information. This practice ensures data integrity and compliance with relevant regulations. It also serves to identify vulnerable information sets.
Tip 5: Establish a Data Retention Policy: Define a clear data retention policy that specifies how long data will be stored and when it will be securely deleted. This minimizes the risk of holding onto outdated or unnecessary information, reducing potential liabilities.
Tip 6: Provide Transparency and Choice: Inform individuals about how their data is collected, used, and protected. Offer them choices regarding data usage, such as the option to opt out of data collection or request data deletion.
Tip 7: Secure Data Transmission: Utilize secure communication channels (e.g., HTTPS, SFTP) for transmitting sensitive data. Avoid sending “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186”-type information via unencrypted email or other insecure methods.
Following these data management tips helps mitigate the risks associated with handling personal information, promoting ethical data practices and safeguarding individual privacy.
The subsequent conclusion will synthesize key takeaways and reiterate the importance of responsible data handling in the digital age.
Conclusion
The preceding analysis of “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186” has elucidated the complexities surrounding personal data in contemporary society. The exploration spanned the elements of individual identification, academic qualifications, contact methods, data privacy implications, information accuracy prerequisites, and accessibility concerns. The combination of a name, a professional credential, and a direct line of communication represents a valuable, yet potentially vulnerable, data set. Each aspect contributes to the overall utility and risk profile of the information.
Effective management of data, as exemplified by “paul greene phd phone number 9176936186”, necessitates a multi-faceted approach encompassing data minimization, access controls, encryption, regular audits, defined retention policies, transparency, and secure transmission protocols. The responsible handling of personal information is not merely a matter of compliance; it is a fundamental ethical imperative. As technology continues to advance, vigilance and proactive data protection strategies are essential to safeguard individual privacy and uphold the integrity of digital interactions.
