The ability to display an Android device’s screen on a Roku device typically relies on a shared wireless network connection. However, situations may arise where a Wi-Fi network is unavailable or unreliable, prompting the need for alternative mirroring methods. Direct mirroring between devices without Wi-Fi presents a technical challenge, as standard screen mirroring protocols such as Miracast are often dependent on a Wi-Fi connection. Workarounds involve utilizing wired connections or third-party applications that facilitate offline mirroring, although these options might necessitate additional hardware or software.
Circumventing the need for a Wi-Fi network offers several advantages. It enables presentations and media sharing in areas with limited or no internet access, enhancing flexibility and convenience. Historically, the reliance on Wi-Fi has been a significant limitation for screen mirroring, particularly in environments where network security or stability is a concern. The development of methods to bypass this dependency addresses these limitations, providing a more robust and versatile mirroring experience.
This article explores potential methods for mirroring an Android device’s screen to a Roku device in the absence of a Wi-Fi network. It will delve into the limitations of standard protocols and examine alternative solutions that may provide a workaround, including exploring USB connections, third-party apps, and possible hardware-based solutions. The focus will be on practical approaches and the inherent constraints associated with these methods.
1. Direct USB Connection
The viability of employing a direct USB connection as a method for screen mirroring from an Android device to a Roku device, when Wi-Fi is unavailable, presents a complex scenario. Standard Roku devices do not inherently support screen mirroring via a direct USB connection. The Roku’s USB port is primarily designed for media playback from external storage devices, such as USB drives, rather than receiving video input from other devices. Therefore, a direct USB connection, in most cases, will not directly enable screen mirroring functionality.
However, certain third-party Android applications or developer options, when combined with specific hardware, may potentially offer a workaround. These applications could, in theory, utilize USB tethering or USB debugging to transmit the Android device’s screen data to a computer or intermediary device. This intermediary device would then need to be capable of streaming or casting the signal to the Roku. Real-world examples of such setups are limited, and their successful implementation is highly dependent on the specific software and hardware involved. This approach often requires a degree of technical expertise and may not be a plug-and-play solution.
In summary, while the concept of a direct USB connection eliminating the need for Wi-Fi seems appealing, the reality is that direct USB mirroring from Android to Roku is not a standard feature. Achieving this requires exploring unconventional methods and often involves technical complexities. Due to Roku devices not natively supporting screen mirroring via USB, alternative mirroring solutions are often necessary to achieve the desired output in the absence of Wi-Fi.
2. Offline Miracast Adapters
Offline Miracast adapters represent a potential, though often complex, pathway to achieve screen mirroring from an Android device to a Roku device without the use of a Wi-Fi network. These adapters function by creating a direct, device-to-device wireless connection, theoretically bypassing the need for a shared internet or local network. However, the compatibility and practical implementation of these adapters warrant careful consideration.
-
Functionality and Limitations
Offline Miracast adapters are designed to establish a direct wireless connection between the Android device and the Roku, emulating the standard Miracast protocol typically used over Wi-Fi. However, the key limitation lies in Roku’s inherent reliance on a network connection for many of its core functionalities, including device discovery and initial setup. While the adapter might successfully transmit the screen data, the Roku might not recognize or properly utilize the signal without a prior or concurrent network connection. Furthermore, the range and stability of the direct wireless connection can vary significantly depending on the adapter’s specifications and environmental factors. Some adapters may also require specific drivers or software to be installed on the Android device, adding another layer of complexity.
-
Compatibility Issues
The compatibility of offline Miracast adapters with both Android devices and Roku models is not guaranteed. Miracast implementation can vary across different Android versions and manufacturer customizations. Similarly, Roku devices may have firmware limitations or hardware incompatibilities that prevent seamless integration with these adapters. Users must carefully research and verify compatibility before purchasing an adapter, paying close attention to user reviews and technical specifications. Testing the adapter with the specific Android and Roku devices in question is recommended whenever possible.
-
Alternative Usage Scenarios
While direct mirroring to a Roku device might be problematic, offline Miracast adapters can still be useful in other scenarios. For example, the adapter could be used to mirror the Android device’s screen to a laptop or other display device with a built-in Miracast receiver. This intermediate device could then potentially stream the content to the Roku via a separate connection method (e.g., using the laptop as a media server). This approach introduces additional complexity but may provide a viable workaround when direct mirroring is not feasible.
-
Power and Connection Requirements
Offline Miracast adapters typically require a power source to operate. Some adapters can be powered directly from the Roku’s USB port (if available), while others may require a separate USB power adapter. Additionally, the adapters often require a physical connection to the Roku’s HDMI port to transmit the video signal. These physical connection requirements can limit the adapter’s portability and ease of use, especially in environments where space is constrained. Ensuring proper power and connection setup is crucial for the adapter to function correctly.
In conclusion, while offline Miracast adapters offer a theoretical possibility for screen mirroring from Android to Roku without Wi-Fi, their practical application is often hindered by compatibility issues, limited functionality, and Roku’s inherent reliance on a network connection. Exploring alternative mirroring solutions, such as wired connections or third-party applications, may be more reliable and straightforward, depending on the specific devices and requirements.
3. Third-Party Applications
Third-party applications can offer potential solutions for screen mirroring an Android device to a Roku device in the absence of a Wi-Fi network. These applications often attempt to bridge the gap created by the lack of native support for offline mirroring, although their effectiveness and reliability vary significantly.
-
Screen Mirroring and Casting Apps
Applications available on the Google Play Store may advertise offline screen mirroring capabilities. These apps typically aim to create a direct connection between the Android and Roku devices, bypassing the need for a traditional Wi-Fi network. Examples include applications that attempt to use Bluetooth or direct Wi-Fi connections (Wi-Fi Direct) to establish a link. However, Roku’s limited support for these alternative connection methods means that success is not guaranteed and often depends on specific device models and application versions. Many of these applications ultimately require a Wi-Fi connection for initial setup or device discovery, diminishing their utility in truly offline scenarios.
-
Media Server and Streaming Apps
Some applications function as media servers, allowing the Android device to host and stream media content directly to the Roku. These apps often rely on the Roku Media Player channel to access the content. While this approach does not mirror the entire screen, it allows for the playback of video, audio, and image files stored on the Android device. This is particularly useful for pre-downloaded content that does not require a live internet connection. Examples of such applications include Plex or similar media management software, which can be configured to stream content locally without routing it through the internet.
-
Limitations and Security Considerations
The use of third-party applications introduces potential security considerations. Applications requesting extensive permissions, such as access to personal data or system settings, should be approached with caution. It is important to verify the application’s reputation and security practices before granting access. Furthermore, the reliability and stability of these applications can vary significantly. Many free applications may contain advertisements or collect user data, while paid applications may not always deliver the promised functionality. Thorough research and user reviews are essential before relying on a third-party application for screen mirroring.
-
Hardware-Assisted Solutions
Some third-party applications require or function more effectively with specific hardware accessories. For example, applications that utilize USB connections for screen mirroring may require a USB OTG (On-The-Go) adapter or a MHL (Mobile High-Definition Link) cable. These hardware components enable the Android device to output video signals via the USB port. The effectiveness of these solutions depends on the compatibility of the Android device, the Roku device, and the third-party application. Such solutions often involve a more complex setup process and may not be as seamless as traditional Wi-Fi mirroring.
In conclusion, while third-party applications offer a potential avenue for mirroring an Android device to a Roku device without Wi-Fi, their success is contingent on various factors, including device compatibility, application reliability, and security considerations. These applications can range from screen mirroring tools to media servers that enable the streaming of pre-downloaded content. However, thorough evaluation and caution are necessary when selecting and using third-party applications for this purpose.
4. Bluetooth Limitations
Bluetooth technology, while prevalent in modern devices, presents significant limitations when considering screen mirroring from an Android device to a Roku device, particularly when a Wi-Fi network is unavailable. The primary constraint arises from Bluetooth’s relatively low bandwidth compared to Wi-Fi. This bandwidth restriction inhibits the transmission of high-resolution video and audio data required for seamless screen mirroring. Bluetooth is designed primarily for audio streaming and low-data-rate applications, such as connecting peripherals like keyboards or mice. Attempting to mirror a screen, which demands substantially higher data transfer rates, typically results in significant lag, poor video quality, and a generally unsatisfactory user experience. A real-life example would be attempting to mirror a video playing on an Android device to a Roku; the video would likely buffer frequently, display a pixelated image, and experience noticeable audio delays. The practical significance of this limitation is that Bluetooth is fundamentally unsuitable as a primary method for screen mirroring in scenarios demanding real-time or near-real-time performance.
Furthermore, Roku devices, in general, do not natively support screen mirroring via Bluetooth. The Roku’s Bluetooth capabilities, if present, are typically reserved for connecting accessories like remote controls or headphones. The underlying software and hardware architecture of the Roku are not designed to receive and process the high-bandwidth video stream required for screen mirroring over Bluetooth. While some third-party applications might attempt to bridge this gap, they often encounter the aforementioned bandwidth limitations and compatibility issues. For instance, an application might technically establish a Bluetooth connection but fail to transmit a usable video signal to the Roku. This highlights the inherent incompatibility between Bluetooth’s capabilities and the requirements for effective screen mirroring on Roku devices.
In conclusion, Bluetooth’s low bandwidth and Roku’s limited support for Bluetooth screen mirroring make it an impractical solution for mirroring an Android device’s screen to a Roku device, especially in the absence of a Wi-Fi network. The technology’s inherent limitations prevent the transmission of the high-resolution video and audio data required for a satisfactory mirroring experience. The practical implication is that alternative methods, such as exploring USB connections or specialized offline mirroring adapters (albeit with their own challenges), are generally necessary to achieve screen mirroring in such scenarios. The pursuit of “how to mirror android to roku without wifi” invariably necessitates bypassing Bluetooth as a viable option for video transmission.
5. Roku Wired Options
Roku devices, while primarily designed for wireless streaming, offer wired connectivity options that may indirectly contribute to achieving screen mirroring from an Android device in situations where Wi-Fi is unavailable. These wired options primarily pertain to network connectivity and, to a lesser extent, media playback.
-
Ethernet Connection
Roku devices equipped with an Ethernet port allow for a wired connection to a local network. While this does not directly enable screen mirroring from an Android device without Wi-Fi, it provides a stable and reliable network connection if a wired network is available. The Android device would still need to connect to the same network, potentially through a separate Ethernet adapter or a mobile hotspot (if available), to facilitate screen mirroring via standard protocols like Miracast or using media streaming applications. The Ethernet connection ensures that the Roku’s network access is consistent and avoids potential wireless interference, contributing to a smoother mirroring experience once the devices are connected.
-
USB Port for Media Playback
Roku devices typically include a USB port that supports media playback from external storage devices. While this port cannot directly mirror the screen of an Android device, it offers an alternative method for displaying content stored on the Android device. The user can transfer video, audio, or image files from the Android device to a USB drive and then play those files directly on the Roku through the Roku Media Player channel. This approach bypasses the need for screen mirroring altogether but still allows for the enjoyment of media content on the larger screen. A real-world example would be downloading a movie on the Android device, transferring it to a USB drive, and then watching it on the Roku connected to a television.
-
HDMI Connectivity
All Roku devices utilize an HDMI port for connecting to a television or display. While the HDMI connection is essential for displaying the Roku’s output, it does not directly facilitate screen mirroring from an Android device without additional hardware or software. The HDMI port is a one-way output, transmitting the Roku’s video and audio signal to the display. It cannot receive video input from an Android device directly. However, some advanced users may explore using HDMI capture devices in conjunction with a computer to capture the Android device’s screen and then stream it to the Roku, but this involves a complex setup and is not a straightforward solution.
-
Indirect Network Solutions
Roku’s wired Ethernet option becomes relevant when considering indirect solutions for “how to mirror android to roku without wifi.” One such solution involves using the Android device as a mobile hotspot to create a Wi-Fi network, then connecting both the Roku (via Ethernet, shared through a network switch/router) and the Android device to this hotspot. This allows them to communicate despite the absence of an existing Wi-Fi network. While not a purely wired solution, it leverages Roku’s Ethernet port to establish a reliable connection within this ad-hoc network. This approach, however, consumes mobile data and may incur charges depending on the user’s data plan.
In summary, Roku’s wired options, primarily the Ethernet port and USB port, offer indirect solutions or alternative methods for displaying content from an Android device when a Wi-Fi network is unavailable. The Ethernet port ensures a stable network connection for standard mirroring protocols or media streaming applications, while the USB port provides a direct playback option for media files. While these wired options do not directly enable screen mirroring, they can contribute to achieving the desired outcome through alternative means. The viability of each option depends on the specific content being displayed and the user’s technical capabilities. Understanding Roku’s wired connectivity is important when approaching the challenge of “how to mirror android to roku without wifi,” even if those connections serve as supplementary, rather than direct, solutions.
6. Hardware Compatibility
Hardware compatibility is a pivotal determinant in the successful execution of displaying an Android device screen on a Roku device without a Wi-Fi network. The convergence of the Android device’s capabilities and the Roku device’s receptiveness to alternative connection methods significantly influences the outcome. A lack of compatibility between the two devices can render even the most technically sound mirroring strategies ineffective. For instance, an Android device lacking USB OTG (On-The-Go) support will be unable to utilize a direct USB connection for video output, irrespective of the Roku device’s potential USB capabilities. The core protocols governing data transfer and video rendering must be mutually supported for mirroring to occur. This foundational aspect of compatibility is often overlooked, leading to frustration when attempting to implement workarounds for the absence of Wi-Fi.
The implications of hardware compatibility extend beyond basic connectivity. The specific version of Miracast supported by the Android device and the Roku, for example, can dictate whether a direct wireless connection is feasible, even without Wi-Fi. Older Miracast versions may lack the efficiency or security features required for stable mirroring, while newer versions might not be supported by older devices. Similarly, the processing power of both devices affects the quality and smoothness of the mirrored image. An underpowered Android device may struggle to encode the video stream in real-time, resulting in lag or dropped frames on the Roku. Conversely, a Roku device with insufficient processing capabilities may be unable to decode and display the incoming video stream effectively. This interaction between hardware capabilities directly impacts the usability of the mirroring process.
In summary, achieving screen mirroring from an Android device to a Roku without Wi-Fi requires a comprehensive assessment of hardware compatibility. This includes evaluating USB support, Miracast versions, processing power, and the adherence to relevant industry standards. Addressing potential compatibility issues is paramount to developing a functional and reliable solution. The challenges inherent in establishing a connection between disparate devices emphasize the critical need for careful consideration of hardware specifications and limitations. Understanding this nexus is vital when exploring methods to circumvent the reliance on Wi-Fi for screen mirroring purposes.
7. Mobile Hotspot (Indirect)
A mobile hotspot, functioning as an indirect enabler for screen mirroring between an Android device and a Roku in the absence of a conventional Wi-Fi network, operates by transforming the Android device into a localized wireless access point. This approach facilitates the creation of a private, ad-hoc network to which both the Android device (hosting the hotspot) and the Roku can connect. Subsequently, established screen mirroring protocols, such as Miracast, or media streaming applications can function as they normally would, reliant on the shared network environment created by the mobile hotspot. The significance of this method lies in its ability to circumvent the requirement for pre-existing Wi-Fi infrastructure, providing a means for localized network communication where none previously existed. An example would involve setting up a Roku and Android device in a hotel room lacking Wi-Fi access; the mobile hotspot enables screen mirroring that would otherwise be impossible.
The practical application of this method is contingent on several factors. The Android device’s mobile data plan must be active and possess sufficient data allowance, as the data transmitted during screen mirroring will consume mobile data. Limitations in data caps or potential overage charges must be carefully considered. Furthermore, the performance of the mobile hotspot, including its range and stability, can influence the quality of the screen mirroring experience. Signal strength, interference from other devices, and the Android device’s processing capabilities all play a role. Despite these considerations, the mobile hotspot method offers a relatively straightforward solution for achieving screen mirroring in temporary locations or situations where Wi-Fi is unavailable.
In conclusion, the use of a mobile hotspot represents an indirect but effective means to address the challenge of achieving screen mirroring between an Android device and a Roku in the absence of Wi-Fi. While dependent on mobile data availability and hotspot performance, it offers a practical workaround for establishing a localized network connection essential for standard mirroring protocols to function. This method serves as a prime example of leveraging device capabilities to overcome connectivity limitations, albeit with inherent considerations of data consumption and network stability. The mobile hotspot method underscores the importance of adaptable solutions when seeking options for “how to mirror android to roku without wifi.”
8. Data Usage
The utilization of cellular data is a critical consideration when attempting to mirror an Android device to a Roku without a traditional Wi-Fi network. Circumventing Wi-Fi often necessitates leveraging an Android device’s mobile hotspot feature. This action effectively transforms the Android device into a localized Wi-Fi access point, enabling both the Android device itself and the Roku to connect to a shared network. However, all data transmitted during the screen mirroring process, including video and audio streams, will be drawn from the Android device’s cellular data allowance. The volume of data consumed is directly proportional to the resolution and duration of the mirrored content. For instance, mirroring a high-definition movie for an extended period can rapidly deplete a significant portion of a monthly data plan. Therefore, the viability of this approach is contingent upon the availability of a sufficient data allowance and an understanding of the potential costs associated with exceeding data limits.
The practical implications of data usage extend to the selection of mirroring methods and content. Lowering the video resolution of the mirrored content can substantially reduce data consumption, albeit at the expense of visual fidelity. Pre-downloading content onto the Android device before mirroring can also mitigate data usage, particularly for movies or TV shows. Furthermore, alternative mirroring methods, such as using a direct USB connection or offline Miracast adapter (if compatible), can eliminate data usage altogether, although these approaches introduce other technical constraints and compatibility challenges. Real-world examples highlight the importance of data awareness: a presentation streamed via mobile hotspot to a Roku device for a business meeting may consume a smaller amount of data than mirroring a video game, due to the differences in visual complexity and frame rates.
In summary, data usage presents a significant constraint when pursuing screen mirroring from an Android device to a Roku without Wi-Fi. The mobile hotspot method, while offering a convenient workaround, relies entirely on cellular data. Careful consideration of data limits, content selection, and alternative mirroring approaches is essential to manage data consumption and avoid unexpected charges. A comprehensive understanding of data usage is therefore paramount to a successful and cost-effective implementation of any strategy seeking to “how to mirror android to roku without wifi”.
9. Security Concerns
The absence of a secure, established Wi-Fi network introduces augmented security risks when mirroring an Android device to a Roku. Circumventing conventional network protocols increases the likelihood of unauthorized access to data transmitted during the mirroring process. Mobile hotspots, frequently employed as substitutes for Wi-Fi, inherently possess less robust security configurations than properly secured private networks. Consequently, data streams broadcast over a mobile hotspot are potentially susceptible to interception by malicious actors operating within range. For instance, sensitive information displayed during a presentation mirrored via mobile hotspot in a public space could be vulnerable to eavesdropping or data theft. The very act of creating an ad-hoc network introduces a point of vulnerability absent when utilizing a properly secured network.
Employing third-party applications to achieve screen mirroring, particularly those claiming to function independently of a Wi-Fi network, necessitates heightened scrutiny. Such applications often demand extensive permissions on the Android device, including access to personal data, storage, and network settings. Granting these permissions to unverified or untrustworthy applications presents a significant security risk, potentially exposing sensitive information to malware or unauthorized access. The risk is magnified by the fact that these apps are sometimes required to bypass standard security protocols of the Roku, giving them a wide gateway to access the device, if those apps were compromised. The lack of Wi-Fi security layers amplifies this risk, as conventional network security measures are rendered irrelevant. It is crucial to acknowledge that seemingly convenient mirroring solutions might inadvertently compromise the overall security posture of both the Android device and the Roku.
Therefore, acknowledging and mitigating security concerns is paramount when exploring methods to mirror an Android device to a Roku without a Wi-Fi network. The reliance on mobile hotspots and third-party applications introduces potential vulnerabilities that must be addressed through rigorous security practices. These practices include verifying application permissions, utilizing strong passwords (where applicable), and exercising caution when transmitting sensitive data over ad-hoc networks. A balanced approach, weighing the convenience of screen mirroring against the potential security risks, is essential. The pursuit of “how to mirror android to roku without wifi” should always be tempered by a thorough understanding of the associated security implications and the implementation of appropriate safeguards.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries and misconceptions surrounding the ability to mirror an Android device’s screen to a Roku device in the absence of a Wi-Fi network. It offers precise and technically informed answers to alleviate potential confusion.
Question 1: Is direct screen mirroring between an Android device and a Roku device possible without any form of network connection?
Direct screen mirroring, relying on protocols like Miracast, necessitates a network connection, be it Wi-Fi or a mobile hotspot. True disconnection mirroring, barring specialized hardware or third-party apps with USB connectivity, is not natively supported.
Question 2: Does a wired Ethernet connection to the Roku circumvent the need for Wi-Fi when mirroring from an Android device?
A wired Ethernet connection on the Roku establishes network connectivity for the Roku itself, but it does not directly enable mirroring from an Android device without that Android device also being on the same network (via Wi-Fi or hotspot).
Question 3: Can Bluetooth be used to mirror an Android screen to a Roku device without Wi-Fi?
Bluetooth lacks the bandwidth required for real-time video transmission. Its use is limited to audio output or connecting peripherals. Screen mirroring via Bluetooth is not a viable solution, nor is it natively supported by Roku.
Question 4: What role do third-party applications play in enabling Android-to-Roku mirroring without Wi-Fi?
Certain third-party applications claim to facilitate offline mirroring through proprietary protocols. However, their effectiveness and security should be carefully assessed. Compatibility issues and potential data risks must be considered before use.
Question 5: Does using a mobile hotspot for mirroring consume significant cellular data?
Yes, mirroring via mobile hotspot relies on cellular data. High-resolution video mirroring can rapidly deplete data allowances, potentially incurring overage charges. Careful monitoring of data usage is essential.
Question 6: Are there security risks associated with mirroring Android to Roku without a secure Wi-Fi network?
Bypassing secure Wi-Fi networks elevates security risks. Mobile hotspots and unverified third-party applications may expose sensitive data to interception or unauthorized access. Caution and diligent security practices are advised.
In summation, mirroring an Android device to a Roku device without Wi-Fi presents technical and logistical challenges. The methods outlined, from Ethernet connections to mobile hotspots, involve tradeoffs regarding functionality, data consumption, and security.
This concludes the FAQ section. The following section delves into concluding thoughts and recommendations.
Tips for Mirroring Android to Roku Without Wi-Fi
Successfully mirroring an Android device to a Roku in the absence of a conventional Wi-Fi network requires careful planning and execution. The following tips offer practical guidance.
Tip 1: Prioritize a Wired Connection when Available: If a wired Ethernet connection is accessible for the Roku, utilize it. This ensures a stable network connection for the Roku itself, even if the Android device requires a separate mobile hotspot for connectivity.
Tip 2: Manage Data Usage Proactively: When using a mobile hotspot, monitor data consumption closely. Reduce video resolution or pre-download content to minimize data usage and avoid overage charges.
Tip 3: Scrutinize Third-Party Applications Thoroughly: Exercise caution when selecting third-party screen mirroring applications. Verify permissions and prioritize reputable developers to mitigate security risks.
Tip 4: Optimize Mobile Hotspot Settings: Configure the Android device’s mobile hotspot settings for optimal performance. Choose a secure password and limit the number of connected devices to maintain stability.
Tip 5: Explore USB-Based Solutions: Investigate whether the Android device and Roku support any USB-based mirroring options, even if through third-party applications. Direct USB connections, where available, can bypass network dependencies altogether.
Tip 6: Understand Hardware Limitations: Recognize the hardware limitations of both the Android and Roku devices. Older devices may lack the processing power or protocol support required for seamless mirroring, regardless of the connection method.
Tip 7: Evaluate Offline Miracast Adapters with Caution: Before purchasing an offline Miracast adapter, research compatibility thoroughly. Read user reviews and verify that the adapter is known to function with the specific Android and Roku models in use.
The application of these tips contributes to a more reliable and secure experience when mirroring an Android screen to a Roku without Wi-Fi.
The subsequent section concludes the discussion and offers final thoughts on the pursuit of Android-to-Roku mirroring in the absence of Wi-Fi.
Conclusion
The exploration of how to mirror android to roku without wifi reveals a landscape of technical challenges and limited solutions. While standard screen mirroring protocols rely on Wi-Fi networks, alternative methods exist. These approaches often involve compromises in convenience, security, or data usage. Mobile hotspots, USB connections, and third-party applications offer potential workarounds, but their effectiveness depends on hardware compatibility and user awareness.
The pursuit of wireless screen mirroring in the absence of Wi-Fi highlights the evolving intersection of technology and connectivity. As device capabilities advance, the development of more robust and secure offline mirroring solutions may become increasingly feasible. Understanding the current limitations and potential risks remains essential for users seeking to bridge the gap between Android devices and Roku screens in environments lacking conventional network infrastructure.
