Screen mirroring applications enable wireless transmission of content from an Android device to a television. Functioning as a digital bridge, these apps duplicate the smartphone or tablet screen onto a larger display. A user watching a video on their phone, for instance, can use such an application to view that content on their TV.
The utility of this technology lies in its ability to enhance viewing experiences, facilitate presentations, and simplify content sharing. It eliminates the need for physical connections, allowing users to effortlessly display photos, videos, and other media on a more accessible and communal screen. Originally limited by technological constraints and requiring wired connections, the evolution of wireless protocols and processing power has made this functionality readily available and convenient.
The subsequent discussion will explore the criteria for selecting effective, cost-free solutions, examine functionalities and limitations, and address common issues encountered during implementation.
1. Compatibility
Compatibility is a fundamental determinant of the usability of screen mirroring applications. Its influence stems from the diversity of hardware and software configurations within the Android ecosystem and the myriad television models available. Lack of compatibility renders an application functionally useless, regardless of other features or purported benefits.
-
Operating System Version
Android devices operate on a range of operating system versions, from older iterations to the latest releases. An application designed for newer OS versions may not function on older devices. Similarly, some applications are specifically coded for older versions to maintain wider accessibility. Manufacturers cease supporting their older phones, leaving them unable to get important and modern updates. A free screen mirroring application must therefore be compatible with a significant range of Android OS versions to be viable for a broader user base.
-
Wireless Protocol Support
Screen mirroring relies on wireless communication protocols such as Miracast, Chromecast, or proprietary protocols. Televisions also support different protocols. A free screen mirroring application must support the protocol compatible with the target television. Failure to support the appropriate protocol will prevent the establishment of a connection. For example, an application exclusively supporting Chromecast will be ineffective with a television that only supports Miracast.
-
Device Hardware
Hardware specifications, including processor architecture and graphics processing unit (GPU) capabilities, can influence application performance. A resource-intensive mirroring application may perform poorly on devices with limited processing power. Optimizations within the application are required to ensure functionality across a spectrum of device hardware capabilities. A free solution that taxes device resources excessively will be impractical for users with older or lower-end devices.
-
Codec Support
Screen mirroring involves encoding and decoding video and audio streams. The application and the television must support compatible codecs to ensure proper rendering of the mirrored content. Incompatibility in codec support results in either a failure to display content or degraded audiovisual quality. Commonly used codecs include H.264 and H.265. A free application must employ widely supported codecs to maximize compatibility across different television models.
These facets collectively dictate the compatibility of a screen mirroring application. The interplay between operating system version, wireless protocol support, device hardware, and codec support determines whether a user can successfully establish and maintain a stable mirroring connection. Neglecting these considerations renders even a feature-rich, free application functionally useless. The broader the compatibility, the greater the utility of a “free mirror app for android to tv.”
2. Connectivity
Connectivity constitutes a pivotal factor in the performance and usability of any screen mirroring application. Its influence extends to the reliability, speed, and overall quality of the mirrored content. Without robust connectivity, even the most feature-rich application becomes functionally limited. The following facets detail the intricacies of this dependence.
-
Wi-Fi Standard Support
The Wi-Fi standard supported by both the Android device and the television directly affects data transfer rates. Newer standards, such as Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), offer significantly higher bandwidth and improved network efficiency compared to older standards like 802.11n. An application reliant on older Wi-Fi standards may experience lag and reduced image quality, particularly when mirroring high-resolution content. For instance, mirroring a 4K video over an 802.11n connection can result in noticeable stuttering and pixelation, diminishing the user experience.
-
Network Congestion
Network congestion, arising from multiple devices utilizing the same Wi-Fi network, impacts the available bandwidth for screen mirroring. Increased congestion leads to reduced data transfer rates and, consequently, increased latency. In scenarios such as a household with multiple streaming devices, gaming consoles, and computers, the screen mirroring application may struggle to maintain a stable connection. Mitigating network congestion often involves optimizing network configuration, such as prioritizing traffic for the Android device or television.
-
Wireless Interference
Wireless interference from other electronic devices operating on the same frequency bands as Wi-Fi can disrupt the screen mirroring connection. Common sources of interference include microwave ovens, Bluetooth devices, and cordless phones. Interference can cause intermittent connection drops, reduced data transfer rates, and distorted audio or video. To minimize interference, users can relocate the Android device or television away from potential sources or switch to a less congested Wi-Fi channel.
-
Proximity and Signal Strength
The physical distance between the Android device, the Wi-Fi router, and the television significantly affects signal strength and connection stability. Increased distance weakens the Wi-Fi signal, reducing data transfer rates and increasing latency. Walls and other physical obstructions further attenuate the signal. A user attempting to mirror content from a device located far from the router or behind multiple walls may experience a degraded mirroring experience, characterized by frequent disconnections and poor image quality.
These facets illustrate the integral role connectivity plays in facilitating effective screen mirroring. The selection of a free screen mirroring application necessitates careful consideration of the supported Wi-Fi standards, the potential for network congestion and wireless interference, and the proximity of devices to the Wi-Fi router. Addressing these connectivity considerations is paramount for ensuring a seamless and satisfactory user experience.
3. Resolution
Resolution represents a critical attribute of screen mirroring applications, directly impacting the visual fidelity of content displayed on the television. The resolution supported by the application and the capabilities of both the Android device and the television determine the clarity and detail of the mirrored image. Insufficient resolution compromises the viewing experience, resulting in a pixelated or blurry output. A “free mirror app for android to tv” must adequately address resolution capabilities to be considered viable. For instance, an application that downscales a high-resolution video to a lower resolution before mirroring will negate the benefits of a high-definition television. Similarly, if an application cannot transmit at the native resolution of the source device or the display, the user experience is diminished.
Practical implications of resolution limitations are evident in various scenarios. Consider mirroring a presentation from an Android tablet to a television during a business meeting. Low resolution would render text and graphics difficult to read, hindering effective communication. Another case involves streaming high-definition movies; reduced resolution would detract from the visual quality, diminishing the cinematic experience. Certain free applications may impose resolution caps to conserve bandwidth or processing power, a trade-off that users must evaluate. Some applications may allow users to adjust the resolution, providing a balance between visual quality and network performance. If you are mirroring a 4k phone, it is important to make sure that the TV mirroring app supports it and can display it on the smart tv.
In summary, the supported resolution is a significant factor when evaluating screen mirroring applications. The inability to transmit content at a sufficient resolution negates many of the benefits of screen mirroring. A “free mirror app for android to tv” should ideally support resolutions comparable to the source device and the television, enabling a high-quality viewing experience. Users should carefully assess the resolution capabilities of available options to ensure they meet their specific needs and expectations.
4. Latency
Latency, the delay between an action on the Android device and its corresponding display on the television screen, constitutes a crucial performance metric for any screen mirroring application. Elevated latency degrades the user experience, introducing noticeable lag that disrupts real-time interactions and diminishes the overall utility of the application. For “free mirror app for android to tv” solutions, latency is often a defining characteristic differentiating functional applications from those that are unusable. The causes of latency are multifaceted, encompassing network congestion, processing overhead on both the Android device and the television, and the efficiency of the encoding/decoding algorithms employed by the application. As an example, consider a user attempting to play a mobile game mirrored onto a television screen. High latency would render the game unplayable, as the delay between user input and the on-screen response would be excessive, resulting in a disjointed and frustrating experience.
The implications of latency extend beyond gaming scenarios. During presentations, noticeable lag between the presenter’s actions on the Android device and the display on the television can disrupt the flow of information and detract from the presenter’s credibility. Similarly, when using a screen mirroring application for video conferencing, excessive latency can create synchronization issues between audio and video, impeding effective communication. Furthermore, the selection of a free screen mirroring application frequently involves trade-offs between features, resolution, and latency. Some applications may prioritize higher resolution at the expense of increased latency, while others may offer lower resolution with reduced lag. Users must carefully weigh these factors based on their specific needs and usage scenarios. Applications that are free by offering advertisements may have more latency due to the processing and transferring of information that is not content.
In conclusion, latency is an unavoidable aspect of screen mirroring technology, but its impact can be minimized through efficient application design and optimal network conditions. For free solutions, understanding the factors contributing to latency is essential for selecting an application that provides an acceptable balance between performance and functionality. Addressing latency challenges remains a key consideration in the development and refinement of screen mirroring applications, especially in the context of freely available solutions, to improve user experiences and broaden the appeal of this technology.
5. Stability
Stability, within the context of screen mirroring applications, refers to the consistent and uninterrupted performance of the connection between an Android device and a television. This attribute is particularly salient for cost-free applications, where resource constraints and optimization trade-offs can significantly impact the reliability of the mirroring process.
-
Connection Drop Frequency
The frequency with which the screen mirroring connection is lost or interrupted is a primary indicator of stability. Frequent disconnects disrupt the viewing experience, requiring the user to re-establish the connection repeatedly. This is particularly problematic for real-time applications like gaming or presentations, where continuous, uninterrupted mirroring is essential. Many free applications rely on ad revenue, the stability and connection may be interrupted due to these ads.
-
Buffering and Stuttering
Buffering, or the temporary halting of the mirrored stream to preload data, and stuttering, characterized by jerky or inconsistent playback, are manifestations of instability. These issues arise from inadequate data transfer rates, network congestion, or insufficient processing power. Such interruptions diminish the user experience, making even simple tasks like watching videos or viewing photos frustrating. Some free apps are unstable because of an underfunded project, and it is important to note that going into the download of it.
-
Error Handling and Recovery
A stable application incorporates robust error handling mechanisms to gracefully manage unexpected issues, such as network errors or device incompatibility. The application should be able to detect and address these errors without crashing or requiring manual intervention. Furthermore, the ability to automatically recover from temporary disruptions, such as brief network outages, is a key aspect of stability. A “free mirror app for android to tv” should continue running even during errors that are likely going to happen.
-
Resource Management
Stable screen mirroring requires efficient management of device resources, including CPU usage, memory allocation, and network bandwidth. Applications that consume excessive resources can lead to instability, particularly on older or lower-end Android devices. Efficient resource management ensures that the application can maintain a stable connection without significantly impacting the performance of other applications running on the device. Developers of these free apps should focus on this issue so that there is a positive user experience.
The facets above collectively underscore the importance of stability in determining the usability and user satisfaction of a screen mirroring application. While cost-free options may be appealing, the lack of stability can negate the benefits of such applications, rendering them functionally ineffective. Users should carefully evaluate the stability of available choices to ensure a seamless and reliable mirroring experience.
6. Features
The breadth and quality of features embedded within a screen mirroring application exert a direct influence on its overall utility and user satisfaction, particularly within the realm of cost-free options. Features beyond basic screen duplication can significantly enhance the value proposition of a “free mirror app for android to tv,” transforming it from a simple utility to a versatile tool capable of addressing diverse user needs. Consider, for example, the presence of annotation tools within a mirroring application. Such tools allow a user to draw on the mirrored screen in real-time, a functionality invaluable for presentations or collaborative work. Similarly, the ability to selectively mirror specific applications rather than the entire screen enhances privacy and resource efficiency. The absence of such features in a free mirroring application may limit its appeal and practical application.
Beyond annotation and selective mirroring, other features contribute to the enhanced utility of “free mirror app for android to tv” solutions. Integrated media controls, for instance, allow users to control playback of videos or music directly from the mirroring application, negating the need to switch back to the source device. The inclusion of screen recording capabilities enables users to capture mirrored content for later viewing or sharing. The support for multiple display resolutions and aspect ratios ensures compatibility with a broader range of televisions and source devices. A well-designed application balances the availability of features with resource efficiency, ensuring that the addition of functionalities does not compromise performance or stability. Some open source apps may have features that are not offered by the for profit entities.
In conclusion, features represent a critical determinant of the competitiveness and user appeal of a “free mirror app for android to tv.” The inclusion of value-added features, such as annotation tools, selective mirroring, and integrated media controls, can elevate a basic mirroring application into a powerful and versatile tool. While the availability of free applications provides an accessible entry point to screen mirroring technology, the presence of thoughtful and well-implemented features often dictates the long-term adoption and user satisfaction with a particular solution. Therefore, careful consideration of available features is essential when selecting a “free mirror app for android to tv,” to ensure that the application meets specific requirements and provides a satisfactory user experience.
7. Security
Security considerations are paramount when evaluating screen mirroring applications. The nature of screen mirroring, involving the wireless transmission of potentially sensitive data, necessitates a rigorous assessment of the security measures implemented by the application. The absence of adequate security protocols exposes users to risks of unauthorized access and data interception. A seemingly convenient “free mirror app for android to tv” may present unforeseen vulnerabilities if security is not prioritized.
-
Data Encryption
Data encryption serves as a primary safeguard against unauthorized interception of transmitted data. Screen mirroring applications should employ robust encryption algorithms, such as Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), to protect the confidentiality of the mirrored content. Applications lacking encryption transmit data in plain text, rendering it vulnerable to eavesdropping. For example, mirroring sensitive financial information or personal correspondence using an unencrypted connection could expose the user to significant privacy breaches. The utilization of strong encryption is therefore a critical security requirement.
-
Authentication Protocols
Authentication protocols verify the identity of both the transmitting and receiving devices, preventing unauthorized devices from accessing the mirrored stream. Applications should implement secure authentication mechanisms, such as password protection or device pairing, to ensure that only authorized devices can establish a connection. Without authentication protocols, any device within range could potentially connect to the mirroring application and view the transmitted content. This is particularly relevant in public or shared environments where unauthorized access is a greater concern. The implementation of robust authentication protocols is essential for maintaining the integrity of the screen mirroring process.
-
Permissions and Data Access
The permissions requested by a screen mirroring application dictate the level of access it has to device data and resources. Users should carefully review the permissions requested by the application, ensuring that they are reasonable and necessary for the intended functionality. Applications requesting excessive permissions, such as access to contacts, location data, or camera, may pose a security risk. Granting unnecessary permissions increases the potential for data breaches and privacy violations. For instance, a mirroring application that requests access to the camera without a clear justification should raise concerns. A thorough assessment of permissions is crucial for mitigating potential security risks.
-
Software Updates and Vulnerability Patches
Regular software updates and vulnerability patches are essential for addressing security flaws and mitigating potential exploits. Developers should promptly release updates to address identified vulnerabilities and improve the overall security posture of the application. Applications that are not actively maintained and updated are more susceptible to security breaches. Users should ensure that they are using the latest version of the screen mirroring application to benefit from the most recent security enhancements. The absence of regular updates indicates a potential lack of commitment to security, increasing the risk of exploitation.
These security facets underscore the critical importance of security considerations when selecting a “free mirror app for android to tv”. While the cost-free nature of these applications may be appealing, the absence of adequate security measures exposes users to significant risks. Users must carefully evaluate the security protocols implemented by the application, including data encryption, authentication mechanisms, permission requirements, and software update practices, to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of their data.
8. User Interface
The user interface (UI) serves as the primary point of interaction between an individual and a screen mirroring application. Within the context of “free mirror app for android to tv” solutions, the UI’s design and functionality directly impact usability and overall satisfaction. A well-designed UI facilitates intuitive navigation and control, while a poorly designed UI can hinder the mirroring process and diminish the user experience. Affordability is often prioritized; therefore, a seamless, intuitive interface is paramount for adoption.
-
Ease of Navigation
Intuitive navigation is fundamental to a positive user experience. The UI should present clear and logical pathways for connecting to a television, adjusting settings, and managing mirrored content. Complex menus or ambiguous icons impede usability, particularly for users unfamiliar with screen mirroring technology. Streamlined navigation enables users to quickly establish a connection and begin mirroring content without encountering unnecessary obstacles. Cluttered interfaces and multiple layers of menus will deter users, even with a cost-free application.
-
Clarity of Controls
The controls within the UI should be clearly labeled and easily accessible. Functions such as resolution adjustment, connection status, and mirroring mode selection must be presented in a straightforward manner. Ambiguous or poorly designed controls lead to user errors and frustration. The user should be able to quickly identify and adjust critical settings without consulting external documentation. Intuitive and well-defined controls are crucial for optimizing the screen mirroring experience.
-
Visual Feedback
The UI should provide clear visual feedback to the user regarding the application’s status and actions. Connection status indicators, progress bars, and error messages should be prominently displayed. Visual feedback allows the user to monitor the mirroring process and troubleshoot any issues that arise. Lack of feedback creates uncertainty and hinders the user’s ability to effectively manage the application. Responsive and informative visual cues are essential for a user-friendly screen mirroring experience.
-
Customization Options
The ability to customize certain aspects of the UI, such as theme or display settings, enhances user satisfaction. Customization options allow users to tailor the application to their individual preferences and needs. While extensive customization may not be feasible in all “free mirror app for android to tv” solutions, the availability of basic customization options demonstrates a commitment to user-centric design. Adaptability and personal settings further contribute to usability and perceived value.
These facets underscore the significance of the UI in determining the overall appeal and usability of a “free mirror app for android to tv”. A well-designed UI streamlines the mirroring process, enhances user control, and provides clear visual feedback. While cost is a primary consideration, the quality of the UI can significantly impact the user’s willingness to adopt and continue using a particular solution. Therefore, developers must prioritize UI design to create accessible and user-friendly screen mirroring applications.
9. Cost
The economic dimension of “free mirror app for android to tv” significantly influences both user adoption and application sustainability. The “free” designation often implies trade-offs in features, performance, or user experience that warrant careful consideration. Understanding these implications is crucial for evaluating the true value proposition of such applications.
-
Advertisements and Data Collection
Many cost-free screen mirroring applications rely on advertisement revenue as their primary funding source. This frequently translates to the integration of disruptive and intrusive advertisements within the application interface. Additionally, some free applications may collect user data to generate targeted advertising revenue. These practices can compromise user privacy and detract from the overall user experience. Users must weigh the benefit of a free application against potential exposure to unwanted advertisements and privacy risks.
-
Feature Limitations and Upselling
Free screen mirroring applications often impose limitations on features, resolution, or usage time to encourage users to upgrade to a paid version. Basic functionalities may be available without cost, while advanced features such as higher resolution mirroring, ad-free usage, or premium support are reserved for paying customers. This upselling strategy is a common method for developers to monetize their applications. Users should be aware of these limitations and carefully assess whether the free version meets their specific needs before investing time in a particular application.
-
Development and Maintenance Resources
Sustained development and maintenance require significant financial resources. Cost-free applications, particularly those developed by independent developers or small teams, may lack the resources necessary to provide timely updates, address security vulnerabilities, or offer robust customer support. This can result in application instability, unresolved bugs, and delayed responses to user inquiries. Users should consider the potential long-term implications of relying on applications with limited development resources.
-
Open Source Alternatives
Some “free mirror app for android to tv” options are based on open-source software. These applications typically offer greater transparency and community-driven development. While often cost-free, open-source applications may require more technical expertise to configure and troubleshoot. The absence of dedicated customer support can also present challenges for non-technical users. Nonetheless, open-source alternatives can provide a viable option for users seeking transparency and control over their screen mirroring applications.
The aspects outlined above collectively illustrate the multifaceted influence of cost on “free mirror app for android to tv” solutions. While the absence of upfront payment may be appealing, users must critically evaluate the trade-offs involved, including exposure to advertisements, feature limitations, potential privacy risks, and limited development resources. A comprehensive understanding of these factors is essential for making informed decisions and selecting a screen mirroring application that aligns with individual needs and preferences.
Frequently Asked Questions About Free Screen Mirroring Applications
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the selection, functionality, and limitations of free screen mirroring applications for Android devices to televisions.
Question 1: Are truly free screen mirroring applications genuinely free, or are there hidden costs?
While some screen mirroring applications are advertised as “free,” revenue generation is often achieved through advertisements displayed within the application or through the collection of user data for marketing purposes. Users should carefully review the application’s terms of service and privacy policy to understand the implications of data collection practices. Upselling to paid versions with enhanced features or ad-free usage is also a common practice.
Question 2: What factors contribute to latency when using a free screen mirroring application?
Latency, or the delay between action and display, is influenced by several factors, including network congestion, processing capabilities of both the Android device and the television, and the efficiency of the application’s encoding/decoding algorithms. Free applications, due to resource constraints, may exhibit higher latency compared to paid alternatives. The wireless protocol in use, such as Miracast or Chromecast, also impacts latency levels.
Question 3: How does compatibility affect the usability of a free screen mirroring application?
Compatibility is paramount. A screen mirroring application must be compatible with the Android operating system version, the television’s wireless protocol support, and the device’s hardware specifications. Incompatibility renders the application unusable, regardless of other features. Users should verify compatibility before installation to avoid frustration.
Question 4: What security risks are associated with using free screen mirroring applications?
Security risks include unauthorized data interception, malware infection, and privacy breaches. Free applications may lack robust security protocols, such as data encryption and secure authentication mechanisms, making them vulnerable to exploitation. Furthermore, excessive permission requests can compromise user privacy. Due diligence is required to assess the security posture of any free application.
Question 5: How important is a well-designed user interface for a free screen mirroring application?
A well-designed user interface is critical for intuitive navigation and control. Cluttered interfaces, ambiguous controls, and lack of visual feedback hinder usability. A streamlined interface enables users to quickly establish a connection and manage mirrored content effectively. A user-friendly UI enhances the overall mirroring experience and reduces frustration.
Question 6: What limitations should users expect from free screen mirroring applications?
Users should anticipate limitations in features, resolution, performance, and customer support. Free applications may restrict access to advanced functionalities, impose resolution caps, exhibit higher latency, and provide limited technical assistance. These limitations are often a trade-off for cost-free access to basic screen mirroring capabilities. Open source or older versions can have limitations as well.
In summary, while free screen mirroring applications offer a cost-effective solution for displaying Android device content on televisions, users must carefully consider the potential trade-offs in security, performance, features, and user experience.
The subsequent article section will present a curated list of recommended free screen mirroring applications, accompanied by detailed evaluations based on the criteria discussed herein.
Tips
Optimizing the screen mirroring experience from an Android device to a television requires a strategic approach. The following recommendations aim to enhance performance and mitigate common issues when utilizing free screen mirroring applications.
Tip 1: Verify Device Compatibility Before Installation. Prior to downloading any application, confirm its compatibility with both the Android device’s operating system and the television’s wireless protocol support. Consult the application’s description on the Google Play Store for compatibility information. This proactive measure can prevent installation of an unusable application.
Tip 2: Optimize Wi-Fi Network Conditions. Screen mirroring relies heavily on a stable and robust Wi-Fi network. Minimize network congestion by reducing the number of devices simultaneously using the network. Position the Android device and television closer to the Wi-Fi router to improve signal strength. Avoid potential sources of wireless interference, such as microwave ovens and Bluetooth devices.
Tip 3: Adjust Resolution Settings Based on Network Capabilities. High-resolution mirroring demands significant bandwidth. If experiencing latency or stuttering, reduce the resolution settings within the screen mirroring application. A lower resolution reduces the data transfer requirements, potentially improving performance, especially on congested networks.
Tip 4: Close Unnecessary Applications on the Android Device. Screen mirroring consumes device resources. Close any applications running in the background to free up processing power and memory. This optimization can enhance the performance and stability of the screen mirroring application.
Tip 5: Periodically Clear Application Cache and Data. Over time, screen mirroring applications can accumulate cached data and temporary files, potentially affecting performance. Clearing the application’s cache and data can resolve performance issues and improve stability. This can be found in the settings of the phone, under applications.
Tip 6: Utilize Screen Mirroring Applications Supporting Multiple Protocols. Certain applications support multiple wireless protocols, such as Miracast and Chromecast. Experiment with different protocols to determine which performs optimally with the television. The appropriate protocol can significantly affect latency and stability.
Tip 7: Regularly Update the Screen Mirroring Application. Application developers frequently release updates to address bugs, improve performance, and enhance security. Ensure the screen mirroring application is updated to the latest version to benefit from these improvements. Many free screen mirroring options come from smaller developers so this may not be an option.
Implementing these strategies can significantly improve the screen mirroring experience. A strategic approach will give the best mirroring experience.
The concluding section of this discussion will summarize key considerations for effectively utilizing screen mirroring and offer final recommendations.
Conclusion
The preceding examination has dissected various facets of “free mirror app for android to tv” solutions, encompassing compatibility, connectivity, resolution, latency, stability, features, security, user interface, and cost. Each attribute contributes uniquely to the overall utility and user experience, and compromises in any one area can significantly impact the desirability of a particular application. The appeal of a no-cost solution must be carefully weighed against potential limitations in performance, security, or features. Understanding the trade-offs is paramount for making an informed decision.
The effective utilization of screen mirroring technology necessitates a diligent evaluation of individual needs and constraints. While cost-free options provide accessible entry points, users must remain vigilant in assessing security implications and performance characteristics. Continued advancements in wireless technology and software optimization hold the potential to further enhance the capabilities and accessibility of screen mirroring applications, thereby fostering greater convenience and productivity.
