Contact information for court-appointed fiduciaries managing properties under legal oversight often includes a telephone number. This facilitates communication between interested parties, such as tenants, creditors, or legal representatives, and the individuals responsible for the asset’s administration.
Efficient communication with these receivers is essential for the smooth operation of properties in receivership. Timely access to this contact information allows for the prompt resolution of issues related to maintenance, rent collection, or legal proceedings, contributing to the overall preservation of asset value and the protection of stakeholder interests. The availability of such details reflects transparency and accountability in the receivership process.
The following sections will delve into specific aspects related to receiverships, including the legal framework, responsibilities of court-appointed individuals, and processes for addressing common concerns.
1. Accessibility
Accessibility, concerning contact information for court-appointed receivers, dictates the ease with which stakeholders can obtain the relevant telephone number. This ease of access directly impacts the efficiency and effectiveness of communication, influencing the management and resolution of property-related matters.
-
Public Record Availability
Court records often contain the contact details for appointed receivers. The accessibility of these records, whether through online databases or physical archives, determines how quickly and easily interested parties can obtain the required telephone number. Restrictions on access or cumbersome search processes hinder effective communication.
-
Official Communications
Official notices related to properties in receivership should prominently display the receiver’s contact information, including the telephone number. Clarity and visibility in these communications are critical. Ambiguous or incomplete information necessitates additional effort to locate the correct contact, potentially delaying crucial interactions.
-
Property Management Signage
For occupied properties, clearly displayed signage with the receiver’s telephone number can provide immediate accessibility for tenants. This is particularly relevant for reporting urgent maintenance issues or addressing other immediate concerns. The absence of such signage creates a barrier to direct communication.
-
Legal Representation
Legal representatives acting on behalf of parties involved in a receivership proceeding should have ready access to the receiver’s contact information. Streamlined communication channels between legal counsel facilitate efficient information exchange and expedite legal processes. Any obstacles in obtaining these contact details impede the progress of legal matters.
The accessibility of the receiver’s telephone number, as exemplified by the above scenarios, directly influences the stakeholder’s ability to communicate effectively. Barriers to access translate to potential delays in issue resolution, increased administrative burden, and overall inefficiencies in the receivership process.
2. Verification
Verification, in the context of contact details for court-appointed receivers, underscores the critical need to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the provided telephone number. This process safeguards against miscommunication, potential fraud, and ensures that stakeholders are communicating with the legitimately appointed fiduciary.
-
Court Record Confirmation
Cross-referencing the provided telephone number with official court records represents a primary method of verification. This involves checking databases or contacting the court clerk’s office to confirm that the number corresponds to the individual or entity appointed as receiver. Discrepancies between the provided number and official records warrant immediate investigation, as they could indicate fraudulent activity or outdated information.
-
Direct Communication with the Court
Contacting the court directly to verify the receiver’s telephone number provides an additional layer of security. This is particularly useful in cases where online court records are incomplete or unavailable. Speaking with court personnel allows stakeholders to confirm the receiver’s appointment and obtain the officially registered contact number, mitigating the risk of interacting with imposters.
-
Independent Legal Counsel Review
Seeking verification from independent legal counsel represents a prudent approach, especially in complex receivership cases. An attorney can conduct due diligence to confirm the receiver’s credentials and contact information, ensuring that all communication is directed to the legitimate representative. This step is particularly crucial when significant financial transactions or legal decisions are involved.
-
Official Documentation Review
Reviewing official court orders and related documentation provides a baseline for verifying the receiver’s contact information. These documents should clearly state the receiver’s name, address, and telephone number. Any discrepancies between the provided number and the information contained in these official records raise red flags and necessitate further investigation before initiating communication.
The multifaceted approach to verification, encompassing court record confirmation, direct court communication, independent legal counsel review, and official documentation scrutiny, collectively enhances the integrity of the communication process within receivership proceedings. Rigorous verification protocols minimize the risk of interacting with unauthorized parties, ensuring that stakeholders engage with the legitimately appointed receiver and safeguard their interests.
3. Legitimacy
Legitimacy, when considering contact details for court-appointed receivers, is of paramount importance. It confirms that the telephone number in question connects directly to the individual or entity legally authorized to manage the assets under receivership. Establishing this legitimacy prevents fraudulent interactions and ensures that communications are directed to the appropriate authority.
-
Court Appointment Orders
The most definitive source of legitimacy is the court order formally appointing the receiver. This document should explicitly name the receiver and may include contact information. Verifying that the provided telephone number aligns with the details in the court order is a critical first step. The absence of this information or discrepancies raise immediate concerns regarding the number’s legitimacy. Real-world examples include referencing the case name and number on the order to confirm against the court records.
-
Bar Association Membership
If the receiver is an attorney, confirmation of their good standing with the relevant state bar association adds a layer of legitimacy. A valid and active bar membership signifies that the individual is authorized to practice law within the jurisdiction, lending credibility to their role as a receiver. Stakeholders can cross-reference contact information listed with the bar association alongside what they were given, in order to increase the chances of contacting the legal receiver.
-
Court Registry Databases
Many jurisdictions maintain online databases or registries of court-appointed fiduciaries, including receivers. These databases often include contact information and details of the individual’s appointment. Checking these registries provides an independent confirmation of the receiver’s legitimacy and their associated telephone number. For example, if a receiver is managing multiple properties, these properties may be listed alongside the receiver in the registry.
-
Official Court Communication
Direct communication from the court itself, such as letters or notices bearing the court’s official seal, that includes the receiver’s telephone number serves as a strong indicator of legitimacy. This communication confirms that the court recognizes the individual as the appointed receiver and that the provided contact information is accurate. For instance, if a tenant received a notice from the court listing the receiver’s name and telephone number, then the legitimacy of that telephone number can be confirmed.
Confirming the legitimacy of the contact point associated with court-appointed receivers, through the processes described above, is essential for maintaining the integrity of receivership proceedings and ensuring that all interactions occur with the rightful representative. Failing to verify legitimacy may result in communicating with an unauthorized party, potentially jeopardizing the management of the assets and the rights of stakeholders.
4. Urgency
Urgency frequently dictates the necessity for obtaining contact details, including a telephone number, for court-appointed receivers. Time-sensitive situations, such as property damage, lease violations, or impending legal deadlines, demand immediate communication with the fiduciary responsible for the asset. Delays in establishing contact can exacerbate existing problems and potentially incur further financial or legal repercussions. For instance, a burst water pipe in a property under receivership necessitates swift notification to the receiver to mitigate damage and arrange for repairs. Without immediate access to a verified telephone number, the situation could escalate, resulting in significant losses.
The ability to promptly reach the receiver is crucial for compliance with court orders and adherence to legal timelines. Missed deadlines for filing reports, responding to motions, or attending hearings can have severe consequences for all parties involved. Therefore, establishing a reliable and rapid means of communication, facilitated by a readily available telephone number, directly contributes to the efficient and effective management of the receivership process. Consider the scenario where a court mandates the receiver to take specific action by a certain date; immediate access to their contact details is imperative for timely collaboration and execution.
In summary, the urgency associated with various events connected to a property in receivership underscores the importance of having accessible and verified contact information for the court-appointed fiduciary. Addressing time-sensitive matters requires efficient communication, and the telephone number serves as a critical link in that process. The challenge lies in ensuring that this information remains current and easily accessible to all stakeholders, thereby facilitating timely resolutions and minimizing potential adverse outcomes.
5. Documentation
Documentation forms a crucial component of interactions involving a court-appointed receiver’s contact information. The existence and accuracy of records concerning this data, including the associated telephone number, directly influence accountability and transparency within the receivership process. For example, court orders appointing the receiver should clearly state the receiver’s contact information; the lack of such detail could lead to difficulties in contacting the authorized individual, undermining the effectiveness of the receivership. Similarly, tenants should document any communication attempts made to the receiver’s provided telephone number, noting the date, time, and outcome of the call. This record-keeping can prove essential in legal disputes or when demonstrating due diligence.
Comprehensive documentation also serves as a safeguard against potential fraud or misrepresentation. Verifying that the telephone number is officially registered with the court, cross-referencing it with other available sources, and maintaining records of any changes to the contact information are essential. In circumstances where a property is sold or transferred during the receivership, it is important to document the contact information of the new receiver or property manager. Omission of these steps can lead to confusion, delayed responses, and potentially expose stakeholders to unauthorized communications or fraudulent schemes. A thorough audit trail of who was contacted, when, and about what issues provides valuable evidence and protects the interests of all parties involved.
In conclusion, the availability and diligent maintenance of documentation related to a court-appointed receiver’s telephone number are integral to fostering transparency, accountability, and legal protection within the receivership framework. Challenges exist in ensuring that this information is consistently updated and readily accessible. However, the benefits of meticulous record-keeping far outweigh the effort required, providing a solid foundation for effective communication, dispute resolution, and the overall management of properties under court supervision.
6. Communication Protocol
Established procedures governing communication with court-appointed receivers, including the proper utilization of their telephone number, are critical for efficient and legally sound interactions. A defined protocol ensures that messages are conveyed accurately, directed to the appropriate recipient, and documented appropriately, safeguarding the interests of all involved parties.
-
Initial Contact Procedure
The initial contact with a receiver, using the provided telephone number, typically begins with identifying oneself, stating the purpose of the call, and referencing the specific case number or property in question. Failure to adhere to this protocol can lead to confusion or delays in addressing the matter. For example, a tenant reporting a maintenance issue should first state their name, address, and the nature of the problem before expecting immediate action. Similarly, legal counsel should clearly identify their firm, client, and the legal basis for the communication. Proper introductory communication sets a clear, professional tone.
-
Documentation of Communications
All telephone communications with a receiver should be meticulously documented, including the date, time, caller’s name, a summary of the conversation, and any actions agreed upon. This documentation serves as a record of the exchange and can be vital in resolving disputes or providing evidence of compliance with court orders. The absence of such records can leave parties vulnerable in legal proceedings. Therefore, a systematic approach to recording telephone interactions is essential for maintaining transparency and accountability.
-
Emergency Contact Procedures
Specific procedures should be in place for communicating urgent or emergency situations to the receiver via their telephone number. This might involve designating a specific contact person or having a backup number available. Clearly defined emergency protocols are critical for situations such as property damage, safety concerns, or impending legal deadlines. If a property is flooding due to a burst pipe, the contact with the telephone number for the receiver needs to go into action to ensure the right person is contacted right away.
-
Response Time Expectations
Establishing reasonable expectations for response times from the receiver to telephone inquiries is crucial. While immediate responses may not always be possible, a reasonable timeframe for acknowledging and addressing inquiries should be set. This expectation should be communicated to all stakeholders to ensure clarity and manage expectations. For instance, tenants should know what to expect regarding the response time for maintenance requests or general inquiries. A lack of clarity on response times can lead to frustration and potentially escalate issues unnecessarily.
The implementation of a clear communication protocol for interacting with court-appointed receivers via their telephone number ensures effective communication, protects the interests of all parties, and upholds the integrity of the receivership process. Such protocols should address initial contact procedures, documentation requirements, emergency contact measures, and response time expectations. Adhering to these guidelines is essential for managing properties under receivership efficiently and in compliance with legal and ethical standards.
7. Contact Updates
Maintaining current contact information for court-appointed receivers is critical for effective communication and the proper administration of assets under their control. The accuracy and accessibility of these contact details directly impact the efficiency of legal processes, property management, and stakeholder relations. Any changes to this information require timely updates to ensure uninterrupted communication lines.
-
Legal Notification Requirements
Court rules and regulations often mandate the prompt notification of any changes to a receiver’s contact information, including their telephone number, to all relevant parties. These requirements typically necessitate filing an updated notice with the court and directly informing known stakeholders, such as tenants, creditors, and legal counsel. Failure to comply with these notification requirements can result in legal penalties or delays in ongoing proceedings. For example, if a receiver changes their telephone number without informing the court, it could delay urgent communications regarding property emergencies, potentially leading to financial losses and legal complications.
-
Database Management Systems
Effective management of receiver contact information requires robust database systems capable of tracking and disseminating updates in a timely manner. These systems should be designed to capture changes to telephone numbers, addresses, and other relevant contact details, ensuring that all authorized users have access to the most current information. A well-maintained database minimizes the risk of miscommunication and facilitates efficient operations. Consider a scenario where multiple properties are under the same receiver’s management; an updated number in the database will ensure the property is protected and maintained.
-
Stakeholder Communication Protocols
Established communication protocols are essential for disseminating contact updates to all relevant stakeholders. These protocols should include procedures for verifying the authenticity of the new contact information and notifying parties through multiple channels, such as email, mail, and telephone. Clear and consistent communication protocols minimize confusion and ensure that all stakeholders are aware of the updated contact details. As such, an accurate phone number is paramount to contact tenants, property managers and legal consuls.
-
Verification Mechanisms
Robust verification mechanisms are necessary to confirm the validity of contact updates before they are disseminated. This may involve cross-referencing the new telephone number with court records, contacting the receiver directly to confirm the change, or using third-party verification services. Implementing verification mechanisms reduces the risk of fraudulent communications and ensures that stakeholders are interacting with the legitimate receiver.
These processes associated with maintaining up-to-date contact information directly impact the effectiveness and integrity of receivership proceedings. Accurate and accessible contact details, including the telephone number, are critical for facilitating efficient communication, preventing fraud, and ensuring compliance with legal requirements. Effective contact updates protect communication, transparency, and accountability in management.
8. Legal Compliance
Adherence to legal mandates governing court-appointed receivers necessitates the accurate provision and maintenance of their telephone number. Legal compliance dictates that the designated receiver’s contact information, including the telephone number, is readily accessible to relevant parties, such as tenants, creditors, and legal representatives. This accessibility is not merely a matter of convenience but a legal obligation to facilitate communication and ensure the proper administration of assets under receivership. The omission of, or inaccuracies within, this contact information can constitute a breach of compliance, potentially leading to legal challenges and sanctions against the receiver or the receivership estate. For instance, failure to provide a working telephone number for emergency maintenance issues can expose the receiver to liability for negligence, particularly in jurisdictions with specific landlord-tenant laws.
The legal imperative for maintaining accurate contact details extends beyond initial provision. Receivers must promptly update their telephone number if it changes, notifying the court and all known stakeholders of the revised information. This ongoing obligation is rooted in the duty of transparency and accountability inherent in the receivership role. Legal compliance also encompasses the proper use of the telephone number, ensuring it is employed for legitimate business purposes related to the receivership estate and not for personal gain or unauthorized activities. For example, using the receivership-related telephone number to solicit personal business could violate ethical and legal standards governing fiduciary duties.
In conclusion, legal compliance is inextricably linked to the accurate and accessible provision of a court-appointed receiver’s telephone number. This requirement is not simply administrative but a fundamental component of upholding transparency, accountability, and the legal rights of all parties involved. Challenges in maintaining accurate contact information and ensuring its appropriate use necessitate rigorous oversight and adherence to established legal standards to prevent legal repercussions and uphold the integrity of the receivership process.
Frequently Asked Questions About Locating Contact Information for Court-Appointed Receivers
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the process of obtaining contact information, specifically the telephone number, for court-appointed receivers.
Question 1: Why is it essential to verify the telephone number of a court-appointed receiver?
Verification safeguards against fraud and ensures communication with the legitimately appointed fiduciary. Incorrect contact information may lead to interactions with unauthorized individuals.
Question 2: Where is the primary source for the telephone number of a court-appointed receiver?
The primary source is typically the official court order appointing the receiver. This document should contain the receiver’s name and contact details, including a telephone number.
Question 3: What steps should be taken if the provided telephone number is unresponsive?
In cases of unresponsiveness, contacting the court clerk’s office to verify the number or obtain alternative contact information is advisable. Legal counsel can also assist in establishing communication.
Question 4: How frequently should contact information for court-appointed receivers be verified?
Contact information should be verified at the outset of any interaction and periodically throughout the receivership, particularly if there are indications of changes or inconsistencies.
Question 5: Are there any legal obligations regarding the provision of a working telephone number by a court-appointed receiver?
Receivers generally have a legal obligation to provide accurate and accessible contact information to facilitate communication with stakeholders and ensure compliance with court orders.
Question 6: What recourse is available if a court-appointed receiver fails to provide or maintain accurate contact information?
If a receiver fails to provide or maintain accurate contact information, a formal complaint can be filed with the court, seeking intervention and potential sanctions against the receiver.
The answers to these questions underscore the importance of verifying and maintaining current contact details for court-appointed receivers to ensure effective communication and adherence to legal standards.
The following section will delve into case studies that highlight scenarios where accurate contact information for court-appointed receivers played a crucial role.
Tips for Effectively Utilizing Court-Appointed Receiver Contact Information
This section provides actionable guidance on maximizing the effectiveness of interactions with court-appointed receivers, with a focus on optimizing the use of their provided telephone number. Adherence to these tips will improve communication, expedite issue resolution, and foster a more productive relationship with the receiver.
Tip 1: Verify the Authenticity. Before initiating communication, confirm the legitimacy of the provided telephone number through official court records. Cross-reference the number with information on file to prevent interactions with unauthorized parties. This proactive step safeguards against fraudulent communications and ensures that inquiries are directed to the appropriate individual.
Tip 2: Prepare Thoroughly. Prior to calling, gather all relevant information regarding the case or property in question. Having pertinent details readily available will streamline the conversation and facilitate a more efficient response from the receiver. This preparation demonstrates professionalism and respect for the receiver’s time, increasing the likelihood of a positive outcome.
Tip 3: State the Purpose Clearly. When initiating telephone contact, immediately identify yourself, specify the reason for the call, and reference the case number or property address. A clear and concise introduction sets the tone for a productive exchange and allows the receiver to quickly understand the nature of the inquiry.
Tip 4: Document All Interactions. Maintain a detailed record of all telephone communications, including the date, time, topics discussed, and any agreements reached. This documentation serves as a valuable reference point and can be crucial in resolving disputes or tracking progress on ongoing matters. Comprehensive records enhance accountability and transparency.
Tip 5: Respect Established Communication Protocols. Adhere to any established communication protocols or guidelines provided by the court or the receiver’s office. These protocols may dictate preferred methods of contact, response time expectations, and procedures for handling urgent matters. Respecting these guidelines fosters a cooperative relationship and ensures that inquiries are addressed efficiently.
Tip 6: Maintain a Professional Demeanor. Conduct all telephone communications with the receiver in a professional and respectful manner. Even in stressful situations, maintaining a courteous tone and avoiding confrontational language will facilitate a more constructive dialogue and increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
Tip 7: Follow Up Appropriately. If a response is not received within a reasonable timeframe, follow up with a brief and professional reminder. Clearly restate the initial inquiry and reiterate the urgency of the matter, if applicable. Persistence is key, but it should be tempered with respect and professionalism.
The careful implementation of these tips will significantly enhance the effectiveness of communications with court-appointed receivers. By verifying contact information, preparing thoroughly, and maintaining a professional demeanor, stakeholders can foster productive relationships and achieve their objectives more efficiently.
The final section will summarize the key points discussed throughout this document and reinforce the importance of effective communication in receivership proceedings.
Conclusion
This exploration of the significance of “jenkins court receivers phone number” has highlighted the critical role this information plays in ensuring effective communication and transparency within the receivership process. Verification, accessibility, and legitimacy of this contact point are crucial for preventing fraud, facilitating timely resolutions, and upholding legal obligations. The establishment and adherence to clear communication protocols, diligent record-keeping, and consistent updating of contact information are essential for all stakeholders involved.
The availability of accurate contact details is not merely an administrative detail but a cornerstone of accountability and responsible asset management under court supervision. Diligence in securing and maintaining this information is vital for safeguarding the interests of all parties and upholding the integrity of the legal proceedings. Continued vigilance regarding these essential contact points is paramount in the ongoing and future management of receivership cases.
